A major feature is the bringing together of seemingly incongruous types of painting - representational and abstract. As the viewer's eye crosses a border from realism to abstraction, the visual rules change. Then there's a shock to the system when abstract and realist images are smashed together, a jolt like sudden eyesight. Imagine Vermeer meets Pollock. While the work is conceptually pluralistic in its application of different painting styles, the obsessive finessing of the realist areas takes these paintings beyond a comparison with current representation - allowing the viewer to apply connoisseurship that is normally reserved for classical realism. Abstraction and realism share a common ability to evoke. The juxtaposition of the stylistic elements plays out in a straightforward (non-appropriated) manner. Just as there is an indifference to the abstraction / representation "debate", the work displays a tacit dedication to the act of painting. As poured paint can be considered a performance document, so the realist painting is a performance, albeit slower, with shamanistic or devotional overtones. The paintings contain a dialog between the representational and the abstract regions; this dialog may take the form of resonant color, textual correspondences, or compositional devices used to move the eye all over the visual plane. The work is unapolegetically hot, content rich. A high tension gets built up between poured paint and the methodic representation, as if the work reveals a double life - by turns conventional, then illicit. My representational work started in the late 70s leaving aside minimalism. In the 80s, I chose to concentrate on landscapes as an emotionally neutral subject. The process/action painting goes back to an early infatuation with Morris Louis and, of course, Jackson Pollock. November 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|